The other day a good friend asked me whether I knew anything about top loading washing machines. She recently had twin boys and found that her old machines were not up to the extreme use they were now receiving. She needed to replace hers and had been out shopping.
I am very interested in buying one when my current top loading machine (of 20 years) finally kicks the bucket. I had seen them on television shows like “Extreme Makeover Home Edition” and liked the fact that they seemed to be more energy and water efficient. However, like my existing front loading drier, I would definitely require the pedestal that raises the machine off of the ground to save wear and tear on my back.
She really liked the idea of the pedestal for both raising the machine and providing additional storage. But because she had large windows in her laundry room, the additional height of the pedestals would make it impossible to open and shut her windows.
Then she mentioned the killer feature. “But a biggest consideration for me is that a wash cycle is 60 minutes long!”
“You’re kidding,” I replied. “The longest cycle on my top loader is 25 minutes. That is more than double the time. What are you supposed to do, sit at home and babysit the washing machine? It would take me twice as long to do laundry, and laundry is not my favorite chore around the house. And I am only one person. You do laundry for four!”
It turns out that the longer wash cycle is a well-kept secret. I searched on-line, sorted through specs, and rarely was the length of the wash cycle mentioned. I thought that this was a perfect example for showcasing the discipline of the “value proposition.”
Value propositions compare your product with its best marketplace alternative. Most marketers focus on the benefits (positive value) that there product delivers. But if they stop there, they are not creating a true view of the competitive reality their product will face. There are two other important parts of the value proposition. One is the statement of equivalencies - areas where your product is of equal value to the alternative. The other is the statement of trade-offs – areas where you product is of less value than the alternative.
For a little fun, I put together the following value proposition to illustrate a fully formed value proposition.
Front Loading Washing Machine value versus Top Loading Washing Machine
Benefits:
· Can wash larger items at home (no more trips to the Laundromat)
· Does that pesky hand washing for you
· Easier on your clothes (gentler washing motion)
· Uses less detergent for washing
· Uses less water for washing
· Uses less energy for washing (average households would break even cost-wise after 7-9 years of use)
· Enables quicker drying times (because they extract more water from clothes)
Equivalencies:
· Cleans as effectively as top loaders
· Generally the same size as top loaders
Trade-offs:
· Significantly higher up-front cost (average households would break even cost-wise after 7-9 years of use)
· Significantly longer wash cycles (up to twice as long)
· Utilize space differently (which may not make them appropriate for older homes)
· Require bending and twisting action to load and unload
What a value proposition shows is that the flip side to value isn’t “no value”. The flip side to value is negative value. And in that negative value can be some mighty important deal breakers. That is why it is important to create and understand your product's full value proposition.